Back and Spine Health
Spine surgeries have to be handled with a tremendous amount of care and a surgeon will go through a wide array of options to pinpoint what will work for the patient. These details make all the difference in the world when pinpointing the right direction a patient should go in.
The two options that stand out will be endoscope spine surgery and minimally invasive surgery.
Here is a breakdown of the factors that differ between these two procedures and what the pros and cons are. If you are looking for a spine surgeon near Las Vegas, NV give the team at Robo Spine a call.
1. Incision Size
With a minimally invasive surgery, the incision size is going to be much smaller. The surgeon is not going to create a large incision as it will not be required to complete the procedure. This helps with the healing process at the site.
In comparison, endoscopic spine surgery is going to be more invasive and will require a larger incision. This is a difference-maker when it comes to recovery.
2. Soft Tissue Damage
Soft tissue damage is something that has to be taken into account when understanding the impact of both procedures and how they work.
Endoscopic spine surgery will lead to more tissue damage near the site where the incision is. In comparison, minimally invasive surgery is not going to create as much tissue damage as it will be designed to not create a wider incision site.
3. Type Of Anesthesia
This is a key detail that will focus on the experience a patient is going to have during the procedure. The anesthesia that is used during the procedure is going to differ for each one.
The minimally invasive surgery is going to require local anesthesia near the site of the incision. This is not going to be as spread out, which makes it easier to manage for the patient.
On the other hand, endoscopic spine surgery is going to use broad anesthesia that is going to be spread throughout the area.
4. Clinical Research
Research is one of the most important factors when it comes to thinking about what will work for a patient and what will not. This is one of the key details a surgeon is going to go over while looking at the patient’s medical history.
Endoscopic spine surgery has more research behind it, which means it is a more trusted procedure under different circumstances.
The same does not apply to minimally invasive surgery as it is still being researched.
5. Field Of Vision During Procedure
The field of vision is not as extensive due to the incision site being smaller. This means minimally invasive surgery is not going to offer the same comfort to the surgeon while they are working in a tight space.
With endoscopic spine surgery, the field of view opens up and that makes it a lot easier to work on the spine.
6. Established Guidelines
The established guidelines do matter when it comes to medical procedures. Since minimally invasive surgery is still new, it is not as firm with the guidelines.
The same does not apply to endoscopic spine surgery, which has strict guidelines that have been around for a long time and continue to be improved.
When it comes time to choose between the two types of procedures, a spine surgeon in Las Vegas, NV is going to look at the specific factors associated with the patient’s case. These details are critical and will guide the surgeon in one direction or the other.
It’s best to look at the pros and cons of each procedure to better pinpoint what is going to work well for the patient. This will lead to the best possible results over the short and long term.